Discuss & Debate | Share | Learn

www.ask.or.tz

Our Partners
A dedicated forum to share all the news and happenings around the world. Share breaking news and other controversial news that you may have come across.
User avatar
By qarrar
#10186
Beirut, Lebanon- Iranian police shoved and kicked them, loaded them into a curtained minibus and drove them away. Hours later, at the gates of Evin prison, they were blindfolded and forced to wear all-enveloping chadors and then were interrogated through the night.

All 31 were women - activists accused of receiving foreign funds to stir up dissent in Iran. But their real crime, says Mahboubeh Abbasgholizadeh, was gathering peacefully outside Tehran's Revolutionary Court in support of five fellow activists on trial for demanding changes in laws that discriminate against women.

During her 15 days in prison, "I tried to convince them that asking for our rights had nothing to do with the enemy," Abbasgholizadeh told The Associated Press by telephone from Tehran. "But they insisted that foreign governments were exploiting our cause."

The March 4 arrests highlight how women's rights, which were making some advances under the reformist presidency of Mohammad Khatami, are being rolled back by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who succeeded him in August 2005.

Activists say that while world attention has focused on the West's standoff with Iran over its nuclear program, the abuses of women's rights have intensified, using fear of a U.S. attack as a pretext.

Over the past 10 months, security forces have "become more and more aggressive even as women's actions have become more peaceful and tame," said Jila Baniyaghoub, an activist who also has spent time in jail.

"By tightening the noose on us, they are trying to warn us that they will not tolerate even the mildest criticism," she said.

Iranian authorities are reluctant to answer specific questions about the treatment of women. Several officials and lawmakers refused to be interviewed.

But Intelligence Minister Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei recently pointed a finger at women activists when he claimed that "the enemy's new strategy is to finance and organize various groups under the cover of women's or student movements."

The aim, he told a state news agency, is to depict the government as incompetent and to turn people against it.

Abbasgholizadeh, 48, is a divorced mother of two daughters, and her story highlights her change of fortune since the days when Khatami was president and reformists were gaining influence in Iran. Then she had Khatami's ear through the Center for Women's Participation, a government office set up to promote women's rights, and wrote a report for the president on the state of women in Iran.

One of Ahmadinejad's first actions was to replace the office with one called "the Center for Women and Family Affairs" - a renaming that seems to reflect his conviction that a woman's place is primarily in the home.

Under Ahmadinejad, Web access has been curbed, almost all liberal newspapers have been shut, and activists say they are under closer surveillance and often summoned for questioning.

The women say they have borne the brunt of the onslaught.

Sunday, April 29, 2007 Scheherezade FaramarziAssociated Press
User avatar
By qarrar
#10208
Muhammad Mahdi wrote:Why have you posted this?
To facilitate a discussion and a healthy argument, this has become a big story here in the west i.e. women’s rights in Iran, is it enforcement of modesty or just plain ultra conservatism :?:
User avatar
By qarrar
#10209
It is an annual ritual in Iran. As summer approaches, many women in the affluent north Tehran start wearing short and tight coats, and small head scarves, called hijab, showing more hair than usual. This violates the 1981 Islamic Dress Law, which applies to all women, Muslim or not, and which requires them to cover their hair, considered erotic, and wear long loose clothes to mask the contours of their body. A black head-to-toe chador, covering the whole body except hands and face, is regarded as the ideal.

To preserve the strict morality required by the Islamic regime, policemen and policewomen accost "immodestly" dressed women at major squares and underground stations in the capital, and treat them with varying degrees of severity: a verbal warning; requiring the violator to sign a letter promising not to appear in public wearing "bad hijab" - a term commonly used to denote un-Islamic dress - again; or rustling the law-breaker to the police headquarters where she is fined the equivalent of $2 to $20.

The current spring has brought on the seasonal hassle for women. Yet there have been notable exceptions.

For the first time Tehran's police chief, Ismail Ahmadi Moghaddam, was called to testify before the parliament's Commission for National Security considering the complaints about the dress clampdown. He assured the commission that he had instructed his officers to use persuasion rather than force or threats.

Another exception was the warning issued by Chief Justice Ayatollah Mahmoud Hashemi Shahroud on the subject in his letter to provincial governors. "Hauling women and young people to the police station will have no result except social harm," he remarked.

Equally exceptional was the stance taken by some parliamentarians. They argued that since violation of the female dress code did not threaten national security, the job of enforcing it should be taken away from security forces and handed over to those dealing with cultural issues.

As elected representatives, these parliamentarians are in touch with popular sentiment. They are keenly aware that between them, women and the young form a large part of the electorate. An Iranian acquires the right to vote at 15.

A similar motive seemed to inform the decision of President Mahmoud Ahamdinejad's office to instruct the police chief publicly to ensure that his officers refrained from "going to the extremes".

As a popularly elected president, Ahmadinejad is conscious of the electoral weight carried by the youth and women. In his election campaign in 2005, he promised women pensions, health insurance and unemployment insurance.

All this is a far cry from the 1980s when - following the Islamic revolution in 1979 Iran was at war with Iraq - religious feelings ran high.

The Islamic Dress Law, which prescribes the maximum penalty of a year in jail for the violator, derives its religious legitimacy from a verse in the Qur'an. It reads: "And say to the believing women that they cast down their eyes, and guard their private parts ... and let them cast their veils over their bosoms, and reveal not their adornment (zinah) save to their husbands, or their fathers, or their husbands' fathers, or their sons, or their husbands' sons, or their brothers, or Islamic dress their brothers' sons, or their sisters' sons, or their women ... or children who have not yet attained knowledge of women's private parts." (24:30-31)

Some Islamic scholars dispute the interpretation that the term "adornment" (zinah) covers all parts of the body, except hands, feet and perhaps the face. The overarching intention of the verse is to avoid arousing sexual passion between men and women who are not present or potential partners, thus minimising the chance of extra-marital affairs which undermine wholesome family life.

By the late 1990s, during the presidency of moderate Muhammad Khatami, the earlier practice of punishing the bad hijab women with six lashes on the palms of their hands or the back of their legs had disappeared.

Now even a conservative newspaper like Kayhan ("World") is having second thoughts about the significance of women's immodest dress in the general scheme of things. "The way the vices are dealt with should be in a manner that people - especially the youth - would believe that the authorities really want to eradicate them," it said in a recent editorial. "Poverty, bribery and injustice in society are more important problems."

The welcome change should be attributed to the politics of representative government, codified in the elections for local councils, national parliament and presidency, that have been held regularly under the popularly ratified constitution of 1979.

By Dilip Hiro Guardian UK 30/04/2007
User avatar
By kulsham
#10275
lol... seeing is believing!
User avatar
By Muntazir Manji
#10278
Would the Iranian police really treat WOMEN so harshly? I've seen ladies in Iran being treated very respectfully! In fact I have a feeling that perhaps the first article was motivated by the "enemy". This is not to say Iran is perfect!
User avatar
By kulsham
#10279
well i was talking about the hijab in iran especially in TEHRAN..
User avatar
By kulsham
#10282
Muntazir Manji wrote:Would the Iranian police really treat WOMEN so harshly? I've seen ladies in Iran being treated very respectfully! In fact I have a feeling that perhaps the first article was motivated by the "enemy". This is not to say Iran is perfect!
the police in iran look fine they dont treat women bad..... the only problem in iran is, they are a bit narow minded.. not all... but few... they need to travel the world and see alot...

The Destruction of Baqee. This cemetery contains t[…]

NAHJAL BALAGHA

The Lowliness Of The World In Allah’s Eyes […]

Eid Mubarak!

اللَّهُ اكْبَرُ ٱللَّهُ اكْبَرُ allahu akbar allah[…]

Eid Mubarak!

"Eid Mubarak to all! After 30 days of fasting[…]

Ask4help Counseling Helpline